Wednesday, December 17, 2008

5% emissions target is not enough.

5% emission target is not enough

On Monday, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd raised the white flag of surrender on climate change when he announced an emissions reduction target for Australia of just 5% below 2000 levels (4% below 1990 levels).


On Tuesday, Australians gathered in capital cities to begin the community campaign to tell Kevin Rudd: ‘No surrender on climate change'.

Climate Change Rally at Parliament House, Canberra
Dear Prime Minister Rudd,

In 2007, you said you believed that climate change was "one of the greatest moral and economic challenges of our time".

Yet on Monday, 15th November 2008, you announced a greenhouse gas reduction target of just 5% below 2000 levels by 2020 for Australia - that is, 4% below 1990 levels.

Mr Rudd, 5% is unacceptable and dangerous.

A target range of 5-15% will spell the end of Australian icons like the Great Barrier Reef, Kakadu and will place even greater stress on our already struggling Murray-Darling Basin.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has called for developed nations to reduce their emissions by between 25-40% below 1990 levels.

We, the undersigned, are asking you to listen to the scientists and increase the target range for Australia's emission reduction to between 25-40%.

5% is not enough!

Our goal is 20000 signatures! Help us get there!

Support this campaign! Sign the petition here

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Friday Find... on Wednesday.

Ok, so I just couldn't wait to post this for you all. As most of you would know, Himself works for Greens Senator Rachel Siewert from Perth. Another of his good friends, a man I'm lucky enough to have seen work up close and personal, is Senator Scott Ludlam. Scott is one of the nicest, most respectful, hard working people you're likely to find anywhere, let alone in parliament. Recently he's been slogging away against the thoroughly moronic proposed "mandatory internet filter", and is the only politician to strongly campaign against it, pressuring Senator Conroy at every stage.

Now, you should also know that I'm a twitter addict. I find it invaluable for being in touch with people all over the country (you can be in contact with people all over the world, but I like keeping my focus local) and finding out about what is going on in their literal or metaphoric neighbourhood. I've met some amazing people, have talked to industry leaders... and most recently used it to keep up to date on the No Clean Feed campaign, which I'm passionate about. In keeping an eye out for the issue, hearing about campaigns in each state, seeing what kind of action people are taking as a group or individual, I came across this:


It is but the first strip in a web series dedicated to depicting characters Jeff, Rork and of course, our very own Senator Ludlam and the Australian Greens, fighting teh evil Conroy and his terrible plans.

I have to tell you, I find it hilarious. Scott has now become the hero of his very own cartoon. He's portrayed here as one of the lone warriors, where he is responsible for an almost singlehanded defense against Conroy's lame attempts to filter our internet. Scott, saviour of teh interwebs! Yeah! After all, he's already been portrayed as the Indiana Jones of the movement, a rogue challenger.

I'm glad Scott's getting recognised for all his hard work, and in a way I find it even more touching that his recognition is being celebrated in true web style. They're expressing their appreciation in cartoons, emails/tweets of support, mash-up pictures. He really is the poster boy of this campaign after really grilling Conroy in Estimates, and they love him for it.

It's days like this I love our online community here in Australia. There are so many arms, so many interests... but we are all passionate about our democratic right to use it in the way we see fit. We don't want, or trust, an idiot like Conroy (who has just started a 'blog' and can't even get his office to respond to direct emails to his office promptly).

Twitter has been responsible for a campaign where users selected a particular day (during a sitting period, no less, the busiest possible time), signed up for a timeslot, and called Conroy's office to voice their objections. There are rallies on in every state this weekend. GetUp have launched their own campaign. What campaigns have you seen encourage such passion and action lately? How lucky we are to have our very own hero to keep up the good fight.

Monday, December 08, 2008

Bonuses all round!

Well, actually, I won't be getting any bonuses today, nor will most people I know. That's okay, I'm not complaining. I've got it very good at the moment and I count myself lucky in many, many ways. I'm happy for parents, pensioners, carers and people on disability support to be getting extra money. These groups are often marginalised, living closer to the edge than people like myself.

I'm unable to work full time, but I can't get a disability pension. I'm lucky that I have a partner who loves his job and is paid enough that we can live comfortably. It's that, coupled with family support, which means we're not on the streets. That may sound over the top, but it's true.

I can't work, but Centrelink doesn't give a crap. Their aim is to spend as little as possible, not to be a real safety net. CFS is a contentious illness and despite a firm diagnosis from the only industry 'expert' in the state and two GPs, Centrelink still thinks I can work part time, therefore I can take care of myself. Yeah, sure. You find an employer who will take my last minute phone calls explaining I can't raise my arms above my mid-section so unfortunately I won't be in for my shift. Or that I've lost the ability to form sentences, can't find the words for obvious items and what you taught me last week is no longer in my memory. That's the reality of my life; good days, bad days. It's completely unpredictable. Who wants to hire that? Nobody, which is why I freelance and take contracts for infrequent publications.

With my experience with The System though, I understand how difficult it is for people like pensioners or carers to make ends meet. Even if you can claim support (and find your way through the maze of paperwork and bureaucracy it takes to keep receiving support) the money is barely enough to survive on. Rents go up, petrol goes up, groceries go up... but your payment doesn't. This one-off bonus is a big deal for a lot of people. It's a lifeline for those who have resorted to credit to make ends meet, or those who were looking at a pretty bleak Christmas.

So why am I still mad, mad, mad? Because all I've heard all day is the government urging us to spend, spend, spend. I get it. We need the economy boosted. Unfortunately, you've given money to people who have the most incentive to save, or spend on 'essentials' that don't boost the economy. Like their gas bill. Doesn't it defeat the purpose of an economic stimulus measure to give money to people who don't ever really have 'disposable' income? If you really wanted to stimulate the economy, shouldn't you be giving money to sixteen year old girls? They can spend up a storm, and they aren't going to be looking to increase their savings account balance anytime soon.

If ever there was a mixed message, this is it. Here, people who haven't had enough financial support to live comfortably, here's some money. Now make sure you spend it all! Don't leave any in the bank! Please, think of the economy. And the stock market. And shareholder profits. And people lucky enough to have superannuation. Don't worry that we've been telling you all about how the economy is in free fall and we're all going to be broke for the rest of the decade. Ignore that bit. Just spend away, regardless of the fact that we're not planning to figure out a way to help you live more sustainably after this.

And don't even get me started on the fact that nobody is talking about buying Australian. Indiscriminate spending on stuff made elsewhere does almost nothing. Buying Australian products supports our national economy and jobs, rather than a quick buck going to those items Made in China. But no, let's not encourage "buy Australian"... let's just keep saying "spend, spend, spend!"

Happy Bonus Day!

Saturday, December 06, 2008

Mummy drinks because you eat her donuts.

I'm home sulking at home rather than enjoying my previous social plans for the evening. This is all thanks to a rather unsatisfactory ouch-ouch incident with my neck... no idea what I did to myself, but I can't turn to the left. At all. Which leaves me, as previously stated, at home sulking. That is, until about half an hour ago, when I remembered I had a donut in the cupboard. Score! Sulking lowers itself a good 50%. Until I get distracted by a phone call, put the donut down on the coffee table and leave the room. And return to this:



After which, I poured myself a long, long glass of wine (which will remain in my hands at all times). Because otherwise I would be crying. And lord knows I'm going to need fuel to get through the sugar high he's about to flip out on.

Friday, December 05, 2008

Friday Find

These ones are for the ladies... let's celebrate a little good news reportage for the day, shall we?

Rapist 'anxious' to be doctor again

Yes, that's right, miracle of miracles, The Age subeditors have learned what 'how' to 'do' their 'job'. No 'rapist' in sight. Rather, the question is the rapists alleged 'anxious' state. What a nice change, given the amount of times we've been subjected to such shoddy editing, which only furthers the idea that 'rape' is questionable, rather than a reported murder, which somehow never appears as 'murder'.

and for some actual good news, via Perez Hilton of all places

Say goodbye to the Bratz Dolls - forever!

Now I find it hard to believe that they won't make an appearance again at some stage through some magical multi-million dollar deal, but in the meantime, let's savour the thought of a few less Bratz Dolls making their way on to the shelves.